WHY STUDY
PHOTOSYNTHESIS?
Photosynthesis
is arguably the most important biological process on earth.
By
liberating oxygen and consuming carbon dioxide, it has transformed the world
into the hospitable environment we know today.
. Directly
or indirectly, photosynthesis fills all of our food requirements and many of
our needs for fiber and building materials.
The energy
stored in petroleum, natural gas and coal all came from the sun via
photosynthesis, as does the energy in firewood, which is a major fuel in many
parts of the world.
. This
being the case, scientific research into photosynthesis is vitally important.
If we can
understand and control the intricacies of the photosynthetic process, we can
learn how to increase crop yields of food, fiber, wood, and fuel, and how to
better use our lands.
. The energy-harvesting secrets of plants
can be adapted to man-made systems which provide new, efficient ways to collect
and use solar energy.
The light and carbon reactions of photosynthesis in chloroplasts of
vascular plants
Photosynthesis
Photo
means light and synthesis means to make
Process
in which plants convert carbon dioxide and water into sugars using solar energy
Occurs
in chloroplast
ENERGY TRANSDUCTION AND THE CHEMIOSMOTIC
SYNTHESIS OF ATP
It
has been known for many years that the three principal energy-transducing membrane systems (in bacteria, chloroplasts,
and mitochondria) were able to link electron transport with the synthesis of
ATP. The mechanism, however, was not understood until Peter Mitchell proposed
his chemiosmotic hypothesis in 1961.
Although
not readily accepted by many biochemists in the beginning, Mitchell's
hypothesis is now firmly supported by experimental results.
Respiration is an Oxidation-Reduction process
Loss of electrons from one substance = oxidation.
Addition of electrons to a substance = reduction.
Oxidizing agent - accepts electrons.
Reducing agent - gives up electrons.
Oxygen
- very strong oxidizing agent (hence: oxidizing or oxidation)
Redox reactions
E.g. Na + Cl -> Na+ + Cl-
In
honor of his pioneering work, Mitchell was awarded the Nobel prize
for chemistry in 1978.
Mitchell's
hypothesis is based on two fundamental requirements. First, energy-transducing membranes are impermeable to H+.
Second,
electron carriers are organized asymmetrically in the membrane.
The
result is that, in addition to transporting electrons, some carrier so serve to
translocate protons across the membrane against a
proton gradient.
The
effect of these proton pumps is to conserve some of the free energy electron
transport as an unequal or nonequilibrium
distribution of protons across the membrane.
In
plants, chloroplasts and mitochondria are the main energy-transducing
organelles.
The
biochemical mechanism by which ATP is synthesized is directly related to the
specific compartments that exist in each of these organelles.
The
structure and development of chloroplasts have been studied extensively.
As a result, we recognize four major
structural regions or compartments:
(1)
a pair of outer limiting membranes, collectively known
as the envelope,
(2) an unstructured
background matrix or stroma,
(3)
a highly structured internal system of membranes,
called thylakoids, and (4) the intrathylakoid
space, or lumen
These
membranes are 5.0 to 7.5 nm thick and are separated by a 10 nm intermembrane space.
Because
the inner envelope membrane is selectively permeable, the envelope also serves
to isolate the chloroplast and regulate the exchange of metabolites between the
chloroplast and the cytosol that surrounds it.
The
envelope encloses the stroma, a predominantly protein
solution.
Key points:
Protons
are translocated across the membrane, from the
matrix to the intermembrane space
Electrons
are transported along the membrane, through a series of protein carriers
Oxygen
is the terminal electron acceptor, combining with electrons and H+
ions to produce water
Key points:
4. As NADH
delivers more H+ and electrons into the ETS, the proton gradient
increases, with H+ building up outside the inner mitochondrial
membrane, and OH- inside the membrane.
The
stroma contains all of the enzymes responsible for
photosynthetic carbon reduction, including ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate
carboxylase/oxygenase, generally referred to by the
acronym rubisco
Rubisco,
which accounts for fully half of the total chloroplast protein, is no doubt the
world's single most abundant protein.
In
addition to rubisco and other enzymes involved in
carbon reduction, the stroma contains enzymes for a
variety of other metabolic pathways as well as DNA, RNA, and the necessary
machinery for transcription and translation.
Embedded
within the stroma is a complex system of membranes
often referred to as lamellae , individual pairs of
parallel membranes that appear to be joined at the end, a configuration that in
cross-section gives the membranes the appearance of a flattened sack, or thylakoid (Gr., sacklike).
The
thylakoid membranes contain the chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments and are the site of the
light-dependent, energy-conserving reactions of photosynthesis.
The
interior space of the thylakoid is known as the lumen.
The
lumen is the site of water oxidation and, consequently, the source of oxygen
evolved in photosynthesis.
Otherwise
it functions primarily as a reservoir for protons that are pumped across the thylakoid membrane during electron transport and that are
used to drive ATP synthesis.
CHLOROPLASTS AND MITOCHONDRIA SYNTHESIZE
ATP BY CHEMIOSMOSIS
In
chloroplasts the protons are pumped across the thylakoid
membrane, from the stroma into the lumen.
The
difference in proton concentration across the membrane may be quite large-as
much as three or four orders of magnitude.
Since
protons carry a positive charge, a proton concentration also contributes to an
electrical potential gradient across the membrane.
Together
the membrane potential difference plus the proton gradient constitute a proton
motive force.
In
order to pump protons into the lumen against a proton motive force of this
magnitude, a large amount of energy is required.
The
direction of the proton motive force also favors the return of protons to the stroma, but the low proton conductance of the thylakoid membrane will not allow the protons to simply
diffuse back.
In
fact, the return of protons to the stroma is
restricted to highly specific, protein-lined channels that extend through the
membrane and that are a part of the ATP synthesizing enzyme, ATP synthase.
When
the electron-transport complexes and the ATP-synthesizing complex are both
operating, a proton circuit is established in chloroplasts as well as
mitochondria.
In
chloroplasts, the photosynthetic electron-transport complex pumps the protons
from the stroma into the lumen and thus establishes
the proton gradient.
At the same time, the ATP synthase
allows the protons to return to the stroma.
Some of the free energy of electron transport
is initially conserved in the proton gradient. As the energy-rich proton
gradient collapses , that conserved energy is
available to drive the synthesis of ATP.
The light-dependent synthesis of ATP by chemiosmosis in the chloroplast is called photophosphorylation.
In
mitochondria, the respiratory electron-transport complex pumps protons from the
matrix to the intermembrane space (IMS) to establish
a proton gradient.
The potential energy of this proton gradient
is consumed by the mitochondrial ATP synthase to
synthesize ATP.
The chemiosmotic
synthesis of ATP by mitochondria is called oxidative phosphorylation.
Could
a proton gradient be driving ATP synthesis?
To
test this idea, Jagendorf and colleagues devised a
simple but very elegant experiment (Fig. 2.8B).
Washed
thylakoids were allowed to equilibrate with an acid
solution (pH 4) in the dark.
At
equilibrium, the concentration of protons in the lumen would be the same as in
the surrounding medium.
LIGHT CAN BE CHARACTERIZED AS A WAVE
PHENOMENON
The propagation of light through space is
characterized by regular and repetitive changes, or waves, in its electrical
and magnetic properties
. Electromagnetic radiation actually
consists of two waves-one electrical and one magnetic-that oscillate at 900 to
each other and to the direction of propagation (Fig. 3.2).
The wave properties of light may be
characterized by either wavelength or frequency.
The
distance in space between wave crests is known as the wavelength and is
represented by the Greek letter lambda (X).
Biologists commonly express wavelengths in
units of nanometers (nm), where 1 nm = 10-9 m.
Frequency,
represented by the Greek letter nu (v), is the number
of wave crests, or cycles, passing a point in space in one second.
Frequency
is thus related to wavelength in the following way:
v
= CA (3.1)
where
c is the speed of light (3 X 108 m s-').
Biologists
most commonly use wavelength to describe light and other forms of radiation,
although frequency is useful in certain situations.
Wavelengths
of primary interest to photobiologists fall into
three distinct ranges: ultraviolet, visible, and infrared
4
LIGHT ENERGY CAN INTERACT WITH MATTER
For
light to be used by plants, it must first be absorbed.
Therefore,
any photobiological phenomenon requires the
participation of a molecule that absorbs light.
Such a molecule may be defined as a pigment.
Plants
contain a variety of pigments that are prominent visual features and important
physiological components of virtually all plants.
The
characteristic green color of leaves, for example, is due to a family of
pigments known as the chlorophylls.
Chlorophyll
absorbs the light energy used in photosynthesis.
The
pleasing colors of floral petals are due to the anthocyanin
pigments that serve to attract insects as pollen vectors.
Other pigments, such as phytochrome,
are present in quantities too small to be visible but nonetheless serve
important roles in plant morphogenesis.
What
actually happens when a pigment molecule absorbs light?
Absorption
of light by a pigment molecule is a rapid, photophysical,
electronic event, occurring within a femtosecond (fs = 10-15 s).
In accordance with the First Law of
Thermodynamics the energy of the absorbed photon is transferred to an electron
in the pigment molecule during that extremely short period of time.
The energy of the electron is thus
elevated from a low energy level, the ground state, to a higher energy level
known as the excited, or singlet, state.
This change in energy level is
illustrated graphically in Figure 3.3.
Like photons, the energy states of
electrons are also quantized, that is, an electron can exist in only one of a
series of discrete energy levels.
A photon can be absorbed only if its
energy content matches the energy required to raise the energy of the electron
to one of the higher, allowable energy states.
An
excited molecule has a very short lifetime (on the order of a nanosecond, or 10-9
s) and, in the absence of any chemical interaction with other molecules in its
environment, it must rid itself of any excess energy and return to the ground
state.
Dissipation
of excess energy may be accomplished in several ways.
1.
Thermal deactivation occurs when a molecule loses excitation energy as heat.
The
electron will very quickly drop or relax to the lowest excited singlet state.
The
excess energy is given off as heat to its environment.
If
the electron then returns to the ground state, that energy will also be dissipated
as heat.
2.
Fluorescence is the emission of a photon of light as an electron relaxes from
the first singlet excited to ground state.
Since
the rate of relaxation through fluorescence is much slower than the rate of
relaxation through thermal deactivation, fluorescence emission occurs only as a
consequence of relaxation from the first excited singlet state
.
Consequently, the emitted photon has a lower energy content, and a longer wavelength, than the
exciting photon.
In
the case of the photosynthetic pigment chlorophyll, for example, peak
fluorescent emission falls to the long wavelength side of the red absorption band .
3. Energy may be transferred between
pigment molecules by what is known as inductive resonance or radiationless transfer.
4. The molecule may revert to another
type of excited state, called the triplet state
The absorption light by a molecule. (A)
An energy level diagram depicting the various possible transitions when light
is absorbed. A nonexcited molecule is said to be in
the ground state (So). Upon absorption of light of wavelength of either X1 or
X2, a molecule can undergo an electronic transition (solid arrows) to a singlet
excited state represented by either Sl
or S2, respectively
CAROTENOIDS
ACCOUNT FOR THE AUTUMN COLORS
Carotenoids
comprise a family of orange and yellow pigments present in most photosynthetic
organisms.
Found in large quantity in roots of carrot and
tomato fruit, carotenoid pigments are also prominent
in green leaves.
In
the fall of the year, the chlorophyll pigments are degraded and the more stable
carotenoid pigments account for the brilliant orange
and yellow colors so characteristic of autumn foliage.
The Splitting of Water
Chloroplasts
split water into
Hydrogen and oxygen, incorporating the
electrons of hydrogen into sugar molecules
The
Reductive Pentose Phosphate Pathway (RPPP, aka
Photosynthetic Carbon Reduction Pathway, aka Calvin
cycle (after Mel Calvin, in whose lab at UC-Berkeley this pathway was
elucidated following the availability of 14C; aka
Benson-Calvin cycle
(to recognize the contributions of a senior postdoctoral
associate, A. A. Andy Benson), and on occasion, the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle
(to recognize
also the contributions of James Al Bassham, another
member of the research team) is the pathway by which inorganic carbon is fixed photosynthetically.
THE PHOTOSYNTHETIC CARBON REDUCTION (PCR)
CYCLE
Now that we understand the processes
involved in the control of CO2 entry into a leaf, we will now examine in some
detail the biochemical mechanisms by which chloroplasts fix this CO2 and
convert it to stable phosphorylated carbon
intermediates.
Subsequently, we will examine specific
adaptations in the mechanisms by which C4 and crassulacean
acid metabolism (CAM) plants fix CO2 and discuss how the specific biochemical
adaptations are related to the conservation of water.
THE PCR CYCLE REDUCES CO2 TO PRODUCE A
THREE-CARBON SUGAR
The pathway by which all photosynthetic
eukaryotic organisms ultimately incorporate CO2 into carbohydrate is known as
carbon fixation or the photosynthetic carbon reduction (PCR) cycle.
Mapping the complex sequence of reactions
involving the formation of organic carbon and its conversion to complex
carbohydrates represented a major advance in plant biochemistry.
The solution to the puzzle of carbon
fixation was made possible largely because of two technological advances in the
late 1940s and early 1950s: the discovery of radioactive carbon-14 (14C) and
the development of paper chromatography as an analytical tool
In order
to trace the path of carbon it was necessary to provide CO2 that was labeled in
some way so that its fate in the cell could be followed.
Early experiments were conducted with 11C
but its short halflife' (about 22 minutes) required
that complex organic analyses be completed rather quickly before the
radioactivity disappeared.
The availability of 14C with its much
longer half-life (5730 years) clearly solved the time problem!
The technique of paper chromatography
made it possible to separate complex mixtures of sugars and other small
molecules.
The PCR cycle can be divided into three
primary stages :
(1) carboxylation
which fixes the CO2 in the presence of the five-carbon acceptor molecule, ribulose bisphosphate (RuBP), and converts it into two molecules of a three-carbon
acid;
(2) reduction,
which consumes the ATP and NADPH produced by photosynthetic electron transport
to convert the three carbon acid to triose phosphate;
and
(3) regeneration,
which consumes additional ATP to convert some of the triose
phosphate back into RuBP to ensure the capacity for
the continuous fixation of CO2.
'A half-life is the time required for
one-half of the material to decay.
The Calvin cycle proceeds in three stages: carboxylation,
reduction, and regeneration
THE CARBOXYLATION REACTION FIXES THE CO2
Calvin's strategy for unraveling the path
of carbon in photosynthesis was conceptually very straightforward: identify the
first stable organic product formed following uptake of radiolabeled
CO2 .
In order to achieve this, cultures of the
photosynthetic green alga Chlorella were first allowed to establish a steady
rate of photosynthesis. 14C02 was then introduced and photosynthesis
continued for various periods of times before the cells were dropped rapidly
into boiling methanol.
The hot methanol served two functions: it
denatured the enzymes, thus preventing any further metabolism, while at the
same time extracting the sugars for subsequent chromatographic analysis.
When the time of photosynthesis in the
presence of 14C02 was reduced to as little as two
seconds, most of the radioactivity was found in a
three-carbon acid, 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PGA).
Thus 3-PGA appeared to be the first
stable product of photosynthesis.
Other sugars that accumulated the label
later in time were probably derived from 3-PGA.
Because Calvin's group determined that
the first product was a three carbon molecule, the PCR cycle is commonly
referred to as the C3 cycle.
The next step was to determine what
molecule served as the acceptor-the molecule to which CO2 was added in order to
make the three-carbon product.
Systematic degradation of 3-PGA
demonstrated that the 14C label was predominantly in the carboxyl
carbon.
A two-carbon acceptor molecule would be
logical, but the search was long and futile.
No
two-carbon molecule could be found.
Instead, Calvin recognized that the acceptor was
the five-carbon keto sugar, ribulose-l,5-bisphosphate (RuBP).
This turned out to be the key to the
entire puzzle.
The reaction is a carboxylation
in which CO2 is added to RuBP, forming a six-carbon
intermediate (Fig. 5.9).
The intermediate, which is transient and
unstable, remains bound to the enzyme and is quickly hydrolyzed to two
molecules of 3-PGA.
The carboxylation
reaction is catalyzed by the enzyme ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate
carboxylaseoxygenase, or Rubisco.
2 Rubisco is
without doubt the most abundant protein in the world, accounting for
approximately 50 percent of the soluble protein in most leaves.
Rubisco
Ribulose
bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase
(fixes CO2 &
O2)
Enzyme in Calvin Cycle (1st
step)
Most abundant protein on Earth
Ca.
25% total leaf protein
The enzyme also has a high affinity for
CO2 that, together with its high concentration in the chloroplast stroma, ensures rapid carboxylation
at the normally low atmospheric concentrations of CO2.
Thus, the reaction catalyzed by Rubisco maintains the CO2 concentration gradient (dc/dx) between the internal air spaces of a leaf and the
ambient air to ensure a constant supply of this substrate for the PCR cycle.
In the current literature, Rubisco is sometimes referred to as RuBPCO.
ATP AND NADPH ARE CONSUMED IN THE PCR
CYCLE
If the equilibrium constant of the
reaction favors carboxylation with such a high
negative free energy change, where is the need for an input of energy from the
light reactions of photosynthesis?
Energy is required at two points: first
for the reduction of 3-PGA and second for regeneration of the RuBP acceptor molecule.
Each of these requirements will be
discussed in turn.
The Calvin cycle
Reduction of
3-PGA.
In order for the chloroplast to continue
to take up C02, two conditions must be met.
First, the product molecules (3-PGA)1 must be continually removed and, second,
provisions must be made to maintain an adequate supply of the acceptor molecule
(RuBP5).
Both require energy in the form of ATP2
and NADPH3.
The 3-PGA1 is removed by
reduction to the triose phosphate,
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate4 (PGAL).
The Calvin cycle
This is a two-stpe
reaction in which 3-PGA is first phosphorylated to 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate6, which is then reduced to
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate4 (G3P).
Both the ATP2 and the NADPH3
required in these two steps are products of the light reactions and together
represent one of two sites of energy input.
The resulting triose
sugar-phosphate, G3P7, is available for export to the cytoplasm,
probably after conversion to dihydroxyacetone
phosphate (DHAP) .
The Calvin cycle
Regeneration
of RuBP. heavy
stuff
.
In order to maintain the process of CO2
reduction, it is necessary to ensure a continuing supply of the acceptor
molecule, RuBP.
This is accomplished by a series of
reactions involving 4-, 5-, 6-, and 7-carbon sugars (Figs. 5.11, 5.12).
These reactions include the condensation
of a 6-carbon fructose-phosphate with a triose-phosphate
to form a 5-carbon sugar and a 4carbon sugar.
Another triose
joins with the 4-carbon sugar to produce a 7-carbon sugar.
When the 7-carbon sugar is combined with a
third triose-phosphate, the result is two more
5-carbon sugars.
All of the five-carbon sugar can be isomerized to form ribulose-5-phosphate (Ru5P). Ru5P can,
in turn, be phosphorylated to regenerate the required
ribulose1,5-bisphosphate.
The net effect of these reactions is to
recycle the carbon from five out of every six G3P molecules, thus regenerating
three RuBP molecules to replace those used in the
earlier carboxylation reactions.
Rubisco
Ribulose
bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase
(fixes CO2 &
O2)
Enzyme in Calvin Cycle (1st
step)
Most abundant protein on Earth
Ca.
25% total leaf protein
The Calvin cycle proceeds in three stages: carboxylation,
reduction, and regeneration
Carbon mobilization in vascular plants
WHY PHOTORESPIRATION?
In normal air (21% 02), the rate of
photorespiration in sunflower leaves is about 17 percent of gross
photosynthesis.
Every photorespired
C02 however, requires an input of two molecules of 02 (Fig. 5.12).
The true rate of oxygenation is therefore
about 34 percent and the ratio of carboxylation to
oxygenation is about 3 to 1 (1.00/0.34).
This experimental value agrees with
similar values calculated for several species based on the known characteristic
of purified Rubisco.
The ratio of carboxylation
to oxygenation depends, however, on the relative levels of 02 and CO2 since
both gases compete for binding at the active site on Rubisco
As the concentration of 02 declines, the
relative level of carboxylation increases until, at
zero 02, photorespiration is also zero.
On
the other hand, increases in the relative level of 02 (or
decrease in C02) shifts the balance in favor of oxygenation.
An increase in temperature will also
favor oxygenation, since as the temperature increases the solubility of gases
in water declines, but 02 solubility is less affected than CO2
. Thus 02 will inhibit photosynthesis,
measured by net CO2 reduction, in plants that photorespire.
There is also an energy cost associated
with photorespiration and the glycolate pathway.
Not only is the amount of ATP and NAD(P)H
expended in the glycolate pathway following
oxygenation (5 ATP + 3 NADPH) greater than that expended for the reduction of
one CO2 in the PCR cycle (3 ATP + 2 NADPH), but there is also a net loss of
carbon.
On the surface, then, photorespiration
appears to be a costly and inefficient process with respect to both energy and
carbon acquisition.
It is logical to ask, as many have, why
should the plant indulge in such an apparently wasteful process?
This question is not easily answered,
although several ideas have been put forward.
One has it that the oxygenase
function of Rubisco is inescapable.
Rubisco evolved at a time when the atmosphere contained
large amounts of CO2 but little oxygen.
Under these conditions, an inability to
discriminate between the two gases would have had little significance to the
survival of the organism.
Both CO2 and 02 react with the enzyme at
the same active site, and oxygenation requires activation by CO2 just as carboxylation does.
It is believed that oxygen began to
accumulate in the atmosphere primarily due to photosynthetic activity, but by
the time the atmospheric content of 02 had increased to significant
proportions, the bifunctional nature of the enzyme
had been established without recourse.
In
a sense, C3 plants were the architect of their own problem-generating the
oxygen that functions as a competitive inhibitor of carbon reduction.
By this view, then, the oxygenase function is an evolutionary "hangover"
that has no useful role.
Clearly, any inefficiencies resulting from
photorespiration in C3 plants are apparently not severe.
There is no evidence that selection
pressures have caused evolution of a form of Rubisco
with lower affinity for 02.
While most agree that oxygenation is an
unavoidable consequence of evolution, many have argued that plants have
capitalized on this apparent evolutionary deficiency by turning it into a
useful, if not essential, metabolic sequence.
The glycolate
pathway, for example, undoubtedly serves a scavenger function.
For each two turns of the cycle, two
molecules of phosphoglycolate are formed by
oxygenation.
Of these four carbon atoms, one is lost
as CO2 and three are returned to the chloroplast.
The glycolate
pathway thus recovers 75 percent of the carbon that would otherwise be lost as glycolate.
The salvage role alone may be sufficient
justification for the complex glycolate cycle.
There is also the possibility that some of the
intermediates, serine and glycine, for example, are
of use in other biosynthetic pathways, although this possibility is still
subject to some debate.
Recently,
strong experimental support has been provided for the thesis that
photorespiration could also function as a sort of safety valve in situations
that require dissipation of excess excitation energy.
For
example, a significant decline in the photosynthetic capacity of leaves
irradiated in the absence of CO, and 02 has been reported.
Injury
is prevented, however, if sufficient 02 is present to
permit photorespiration to occur.
Apparently
the 02 consumed by photorespiration is sufficient to protect the plant from
photo-oxidative damage by permitting continued operation of the electron
transport system.
This
could be of considerable ecological value under conditions of high light and
limited CO2 supply, for example, when the stomata are closed due to moisture
stress.
Photorespiration
When
rubisco fixes O2, not CO2
Lose
1/2 C as CO2; costs 2.5 extra ATP
Take
up O2
Only
occurs in light
Occurs
1 out of 4 reactions under todays atmospheric [CO2]
Rate
increases with temperature
Types of photosynthesis
C3
The majority of plants
C4
CO2 temporarily stored as 4-C
organic acids resulting in more more efficient C
exchange rate
Advantage in high light,
high temperature, low CO2
Many grasses and crops (e.g., corn,
sorghum, millet, sugar cane)
CAM
Stomata open during night
Advantage in arid climates
Many succulents (e.g., cacti, euphorbs, bromeliades, agaves)
CO2 effects on
photosynthesis
C4
> C3 at low CO2
But,
C3 > C4 at high CO2
The C4 photosynthetic carbon cycle
THE C4 SYNDROME: ANOTHER BIOCHEMICAL
MECHANISM TO ASSIMILATE CO2
Plants that incorporate carbon solely
through the PCR or Calvin cycle are generally known as C3 plants because the
first product to incorporate 14CO2 is the three-carbon acid PGA.
Certain
other groups, known as C4 plants, are distinguished by the fact that the first
product is a four-carbon acid oxaloacetate (OAA).
These C4 plants also exhibit a number of
specific anatomical, physiological, and biochemical characteristics that constitute
the C4 syndrome.
One particular anatomical feature
characteristic of most C4 leaves is the presence of two distinct photosynthetic
tissues (Fig. 5.21).
In C4 leaves the vascular bundles are
quite close together and each bundle is surrounded by a tightly fitted layer of
cells called the bundle sheath.
Between the vascular bundles and adjacent to
the air spaces of the leaf are the more loosely arranged mesophyll
cells.
This distinction between mesophyll and bundle sheath photosynthetic cells, called Kranz anatomy , plays a major role
in the C4 syndrome.
C4 plants are generally of tropical or
subtropical origin representing nearly 1500 species spread through at least 18
different angiosperm families (3 monocots, 15 dicots).
Interestingly, no one family has been
found to express the C4 syndrome exclusively-all 18 families contain both C3
and C4 representatives.
This suggests that the C4 cycle has
arisen rather recently in evolution of angiosperms and in a number of diverse taxa at different times.
Under conditions of high fluence (light)rates and high
temperature (30° to 40°C) the photosynthetic rate of C4 species may be two to
three times greater than that of C3 species.
They appear to be better equipped to
withstand drought and are able to maintain active photosynthesis under
conditions of water, stress that would lead to stomatal
closure and consequent reduction of CO2 uptake by C3 species.
All of these features appear to be a
consequence of the C02concentrating capacity of C4 plants and the resulting
suppression of photorespiratory CO2 loss.
Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) (Part 1)
Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) (Part 2)
Concentration of atmospheric CO2 from 420,000 years ago to
the present (Part 1)
Concentration of atmospheric CO2 from 420,000 years ago to
the present (Part 2)
Global Environmental
Change & Photosynthesis:
C3 vs. C4 vs. CAM
Increasing
CO2
Increasing
chronic and acute temperatures
Increasing
N (vs. decreasing C:N from increasing CO2)
Changes
in water
CRASSULACEAN ACID METABOLISM (CAM): AN
ADAPTATION TO LIFE IN THE DESERT
Another CO2 concentrating mechanism is crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM)-so named because it was
originally studied most extensively in the family Crassulaceae.
This specialized pattern of
photosynthesis has now been found in some 23 different families of flowering
plants (including the Cactaceae and Euphorbiaceae), one family of ferns (the Polypodiaceae), and in the primitive plant Welwitschia.
Like
C4 plants, however, most families, with the exception of Crassulaceae
and Cactaceae, are not exclusively CAM.
Most
families will have C3 representatives as well and some are known to contain all
three photosynthetic patterns; C3, C4, and CAM.
One
of the most striking features of CAM plants is an inverted stomatal
cycle-the stomata open mainly during the nighttime hours and are usually closed
during the day.
This
means that CO2 uptake also occurs mainly at night.
In
addition, CAM plants are characterized by an accumulation of malate at night and its subsequent depletion during
daylight hours and storage carbohydrate levels that fluctuate inversely with malate levels
.
Nocturnal stomatal opening supports a carboxylation reaction producing C4 acids that are stored
in the large, watery vacuole (Fig 5.26).
Accumulation of the organic acids leads to a
marked acidification of these cells at night.
The
acids are subsequently decarboxylated during daylight
hours and the resulting CO2 is fixed by the PCR cycle.
. IS CAM A VARIATION OF THE C4 SYNDROME?
CAM and C4 plants share certain
similarities, but there are significant differences.
A comparison between CAM and the C4 cycle
is unavoidable since they both use cytoplasmic PEPcase to form C4 acids from PEP and bicarbonate,
and in both cases the acids are subsequently decarboxylated
to provide CO2 for the PCR cycle.
However, there are two significant
differences.
The first is that the C4 cycle requires a specialized anatomy
by which C4 carboxylation is spatially separated from
the C3 PCR cycle-in CAM both occur in the same cells but are separated in time.
Second, in CAM there is no closed cycle
of carbon intermediates as there is in C4 plants.
Thus CAM is cyclic in time only.
Since CAM occurs in the more primitive
ferns and Welwitschia whereas the C4 cycle is
found only in angiosperms, it appears that CAM preceded C4 photosynthesis in
evolutionary time..
CAM PLANTS ARE PARTICULARLY SUITED TO DRY
HABITATS
As mentioned above, CAM represents a
particularly significant adaptation to exceptionally dry habitats
. Many CAM plants are true desert plants,
growing in shallow, sandy soils with little available water.
Nocturnal opening of the stomata allows
for CO2 uptake during periods when conditions leading to evaporative water loss
are at a minimum.
Then, during the daylight hours when the
stomata are closed to reduce water loss, photosynthesis can proceed by using
the reservoir of stored CO2.
The CAM pathway is similar to the C4
pathway
This interpretation is supported by the
transpiration ratio for CAM plants, in the range of 50 to 100, which is
substantially lower than that for either C3 or C4 plants.
There is a price to be paid, however. Rates
for daily carbon assimilation by CAM plants are only about one-half those of C3
plants and one-third those of C4.
CAM plants can be expected to grow more
slowly under conditions of adequate moisture.
On the other hand, CO2 uptake by CAM
plants will continue under conditions of water stress that would cause complete
cessation of photosynthesis in C3 plants and severely restrict carbon uptake by
C4 plants.
CAM plants enjoy the further advantage of being
able to retain and reassimilate respired C02, thus
preventing loss of carbon and helping to maintain a favorable dry weight
through extended periods of severe drought.
Photosynthetic N-use
efficiency
C4
plants need (have) less leaf N than C3
Photosynthesis
higher per unit N in C4
Humans
are increasing global N, which benefits C3 more than C4
Increasing
CO2 decreases leaf N content, more in C3 than C4
Photosynthetic water-use
efficiency
C4
plants use less water than C3
(cause stomates open less)
Water
availability may increase or decrease in the future.
Predicting the future for
plants
How
will increases in CO2, N, and chronic and acute heat stress affect
photosynthesis?
Who
will win or lose? C3? C4?
How
will pollution (eg, ozone) interact?
Sucrose synthesis